Thursday, January 20, 2011

Minnesota General NPDES Permit For Pesticide Application

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has released a proposed general NPDES permit to cover certain types of applications of pesticides. The need for NPDES permit coverage is in response to a 2009 ruling by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals that NPDES permits were required for all biological and chemical pesticide applications that leave a residue in water including applications are made in or over, including near, waters of the United States.

Unlike the single permit proposed by EPA on June 4, 2010, MPCA has prepared four separate General Pesticide Permits to address different use patterns - Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control (MNG870000), Forest Canopy Pest Control (MNG873000), Aquatic Nuisance Animal Pest Control (MNG874000), and Vegetative Pests and Algae Control (MNG876000).

Only entities that exceed a threshold listed in each permit are required to submit an application for permit coverage. Permittees that are required to submit an application must do so within six months after permit issuance. Those applicators that do not exceed the threshold will need to comply with the basic permit requirements, but are not required to submit an application.

The permits require that all permittees minimize their discharges to waters of the state. This includes using the lowest effective amount of pesticide and optimal frequency of application, preventing leaks and spills, calibrating equipment, and monitoring to record the amount of pesticides used and the area where they are applied to determine when/if the threshold will be exceeded. Visual monitoring is also required during pesticide application to identify adverse effects to non-target organisms. If there are adverse effects from pesticide application, the permittee is required to contact the Duty Officer and take corrective actions to minimize the effects. Permittees must also implement Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and develop a Pesticide Discharge Management Plan (PDMP).

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address water quality standards, wastewater permitting and assessing potential impacts of chemicals in the aquatic environment.

Caltha LLP Aquatic Toxicology / WQ Standards Services Website

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Aquatic Life Screening Value ALSV Methodology Assessment Proposed

US EPA is currently evaluating potential methods to derive “Aquatic Life Screening Value” ALSV, that could be used by EPA, States and Tribes to set water quality standards or used in ecological risk assessments. EPA has developed a set of draft white papers that explore: (1) the use of various tools to estimate aquatic toxicity data; (2) approaches for deriving community level benchmarks; and (3) procedures for better integrating plant effects data into community level assessments. A stakeholders meeting was held December 1, 2010, and the agency is accepting written comments on their proposed evaluation through January 15, 2011.

In order to characterize potential adverse effects of chemicals in the aquatic environment, the EPA, States an Tribes currently use available toxicity data from studies involving individual test species, which serve as surrogates for untested species. These data are collected for individual organisms exposed to chemicals and are then frequently extended to represent effects to populations of the same species, populations of similar genera/taxa, or to aquatic ecosystems. In many cases, the number of acceptable studies is very limited.

The goal of EPA’s current proposal is to examine how limited test results can best be used to characterize adverse effects on aquatic life, especially related to methods used by the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) and the Office of Water (OW). A portion of this work will address the derivation of an “Aquatic Life Screening Value” may be used to screen concentrations of pesticides and effluents in ambient waters. According to EPA, the ALSV might also be used by States and Tribes in the development of water quality standards.

EPA has proposed analyses to be conducted in order to determine the utility of specific methods to meet the mandates of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). After the analysis of available tools and methods, the agency’s conceptual approach will be to refine and finalize specific methods and considerations for deriving ALSVs for chemicals.

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address water quality standards, wastewater permitting and assessing potential impacts of chemicals in the aquatic environment.

Caltha LLP Aquatic Toxicology / WQ Standards Services Website

Monday, December 13, 2010

Comments On Vessel General Permit Requested

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has scheduled a session to request input on suggested improvements for the next Vessel General Permit (VGP). The VGP is a General National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit that regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of certain vessels. EPA is seeking public comment on requirements currently contained in the 2008 VGP, which expires in 2013, and any changes or additions recommended for the next permit.

The listening session will be held on December 15, 2010 at EPA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. EPA will accept written comments and relevant information for developing the next permit until December 31, 2010.

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address water quality standards, wastewater permitting and assessing potential impacts of chemicals in the aquatic environment.

Caltha LLP Aquatic Toxicology / WQ Standards Services Website

Sunday, December 5, 2010

ADEQ Proposed General Permit For Pesticide Application

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) released a proposed general permit applicable to point source discharges of pesticides to the waters of the State (Permit No. AZG2011-001). This permit applies to pesticide application on or near surface waters in Arizona. The draft permit includes numerous requirements to be completed before, during and after pesticide applications.

Read a summary of the proposed ADEQ general permit for application of pesticides


EPA requires all States that are authorized to issue NPDES permits, including Arizona, to issue permits for pesticide applications. Most States have elected to prepare a general permit format.

Link to additional information on pesticide application permits


Coverage under the draft general permit will be available for pesticide application operators. An operator generally includes both (1) the entity with control over the financing for, or the decision to perform pesticide applications and (2) the entity with day-to-day operational control of or who performs activities (e.g., the application of pesticides) that are necessary to ensure compliance with the permit. More than one operator may be responsible for compliance with this permit for any single discharge from the application of pesticides.

The permit will be available to operators who apply either biological pesticides or chemical pesticides, when the pesticide application falls within specified pesticide use patterns.

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address water quality standards, wastewater permitting and assessing potential impacts of chemicals in the aquatic environment.

Caltha LLP Aquatic Toxicology / WQ Standards Services Website

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Annual Treatment Area Thresholds In Proposed ADEQ Pesticide Application Permit

In December 2010, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) released a proposed general permit applicable to point source discharges of pesticides to the waters of the State (Permit No. AZG2011-001). This permit applies to pesticide application on or near surface waters in Arizona.

Read a summary of the proposed ADEQ general permit for application of pesticides


Read background on pesticide permitting requirements


Operators required to submit an NOI that meet or exceed the annual threshold(s) must comply with the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Practices listed in the permit. In addition, operators that exceed annual thresholds also prepare and implement a Pesticide Discharge Management Plan (PDMP).

The Annual Treatment Area Thresholds proposed by ADEQ in the draft permit are:

Mosquitoes and Other Flying Insect Pests: 640 acres of treatment area

Aquatic Weed and Algae Control:

In Water: 20 acres of treatment area

At Water’s Edge: 20 linear miles of treatment area at water’s edge

Aquatic Nuisance Animal Control:

In Water: 20 acres of treatment area

At Water’s Edge: 20 linear miles of treatment area at water’s edge

Forest Canopy Pest Control: 640 acres of treatment area

Discharges to impaired waters or Outstanding Arizona Waters: Any amount




Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address water quality standards, wastewater permitting and assessing potential impacts of chemicals in the aquatic environment.

Caltha LLP Aquatic Toxicology / WQ Standards Services Website

Texas TCEQ Ordered To Issue Backlogged NPDES Permits

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has requested the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) take the necessary steps to reissue Clean Water Act discharge permits to sewage treatment plants and industrial facilities in Texas.

TCEQ has a significant number of draft Clean Water Act discharge permits that not been issued pending resolution of various concerns raised by EPA. Of the 80 discharge permits of concern, a large number of these draft permits have been delayed due to issues regarding the toxicity of the discharges. In some cases, EPA has expressed concern that expired permits continue to authorize toxic discharges.

To ensure that TCEQ’s and EPA’s legal requirements and program commitments continue to be met, EPA has requested that TCEQ issue the overdue discharge permits within six months.


Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address water quality standards, wastewater permitting and assessing potential impacts of chemicals in the aquatic environment.

Caltha LLP Aquatic Toxicology / WQ Standards Services Website


Monday, November 29, 2010

New Antidegradation Requirements In Proposed Wisconsin Stormwater Permits

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) has published four of its proposed reissued general permits for storm water discharges. To review a summary of each of the permit, click on the links below:

Tier 1 Industrial Facilities (Permit No. S067849-3);
Tier 2 Industrial Facilities (Permit No. S067857-3);
Recycling of Scrap and Waste Materials (Permit No. S058831-2); and
Dismantling of Vehicles for Parts Selling and Salvage (Permit No. S059145-2).


Some of the key changes reflected in WDNR’s proposed permits compared to the expired permits involve additional requirements placed on facilities that discharge to certain types of water bodies, especially in reference to Wisconsin's antidegradation policy. Some of the key changes are:

Discharges To Outstanding and Exceptional Resource Waters. A facility covered under the permit may not create a new storm water discharge to an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW) or an Exceptional Resource Water (ERW) unless the facility’s storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is updated to prevent the discharge of pollutants above background levels within the water body.
What are Wisconsin Outstanding Resource Water (ORW) or an Exceptional Resource Water (ERW)?

WDNR defines “new storm water discharge” as a discharge that did not exist before the start date of permit coverage. A new discharge does not include an increase in a storm water discharge to a water body to which the facility discharged on or before permit coverage started.
If a facility has an existing storm water discharge to an ERW, it may not increase the discharge of pollutants that results in a violation of water quality standards. If a facility has an existing storm water discharge to an ORW, it may increase the discharge of pollutants provided that: 1) the pollutant concentration within the receiving water would not increase; and 2) the increased discharge would not result in a violation of any water quality standard.

Discharges To Impaired Water Bodies and Total Maximum Daily Load Requirements: If a facility discharges a pollutant of concern to a listed impaired water body, the pollutant levels in the discharge need to be reduced as much as possible as part of an overall state effort to reduce the pollutant loading to impaired water bodies. The proposed permit requires that an annual check be conducted to determine if the facility discharges listed impaired water body, and to update their SWPPP to reduce the pollutant of concern

Federal law prohibits the issuance of a WPDES permit to a new source or new discharger that will contribute to a violation of a water quality standard in a listed impaired water. For a new facility requesting coverage under the general permit, the DNR will evaluate the proposed new pollutant discharge and receiving water to determine if the above requirement can be met.
The proposed permit also requires that facilities conduct an annual check to determine whether the facility discharges storm water runoff to a water body that has an EPA approved TMDL allocation, and to determine if additional storm water control measures are necessary.

Discharges To Fish and Aquatic Life Waters: Under the general permit, a facility must determine whether its discharges storm water to a fish and aquatic life water as defined in Wisconsin Rules. Most receiving waters in Wisconsin are classified as a fish and aquatic life waters. A facility can not create a new storm water discharge to a fish and aquatic life water unless the storm water pollution prevention plan is designed to prevent the significant lowering of water quality.
What are Wisconsin Fish and Aquatic Life Waters?

Compliance with Runoff Management Performance Standards: Wisconsin Rules specifies post-construction performance standards for new development and redevelopment. A newly constructed or redeveloped industrial facility that is required to meet the post-construction performance standards must describe in its SWPPP the BMPs necessary to maintain compliance with the applicable performance standards.

Discharges To The Great Lakes & Tributaries: Under the proposed permit, discharge of persistent, bioaccumulating toxic (PBT) substances to the Great Lakes waters or their tributaries, must be limited to the maximum extent practicable.



Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address water quality standards, wastewater permitting and assessing potential impacts of chemicals in the aquatic environment.

Caltha LLP Aquatic Toxicology / WQ Standards Services Website